[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95f73965-5ba4-4c02-8dc2-09771952ab1b@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 18:29:52 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: ohci: s3c2410: Drop support for S3C2410
On 30/08/2025 17:25, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 03:01:02PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Samsung S3C24xx family of SoCs was removed the Linux kernel in the
>> commit 61b7f8920b17 ("ARM: s3c: remove all s3c24xx support"), in January
>> 2023. There are no in-kernel users of remaining S3C24xx compatibles.
>>
>> The driver is still being used via platform code for S3C64xx platforms.
>
> This title and description are a bit confusing. I gather that while the
> S3C24xx chipsets are not longer supported, the S3C24xx OHCI controller
> is still being used in S3C64xx systems.
>
> So what the patch does is drop support for S3C2410 _systems_ while
> retaining support for S3C2410 _controllers_. Is that right? If so, can
> we change $SUBJECT to say "usb: ohci: Drop DT support for S3C2410
> systems"?
Yes, true. I'll adjust the subject.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists