linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] media: v4l2-ctrls: Enable support for u64 value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <abd7a0e3-abe2-4125-8ddd-9dfad24a704b@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 11:06:38 +0200
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@...nel.org>
To: Sunny Patel <nueralspacetech@...il.com>,
 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...nel.org>,
 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: v4l2-ctrls: Enable support for u64 value

On 31/08/2025 10:06, Sunny Patel wrote:
> Added Support for unsigned 64 bit value
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sunny Patel <nueralspacetech@...il.com>
> ---
>  include/media/v4l2-ctrls.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-ctrls.h b/include/media/v4l2-ctrls.h
> index c32c46286441..7b2bc459f378 100644
> --- a/include/media/v4l2-ctrls.h
> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-ctrls.h
> @@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ typedef void (*v4l2_ctrl_notify_fnc)(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl, void *priv);
>   * @cur.val:	The control's current value, if the @type is represented via
>   *		a u32 integer (see &enum v4l2_ctrl_type).
>   * @val:	The control's new s32 value.
> + * @val64:	The control's new u64 value.
>   * @p_def:	The control's default value represented via a union which
>   *		provides a standard way of accessing control types
>   *		through a pointer (for compound controls only).
> @@ -313,6 +314,7 @@ struct v4l2_ctrl {
>  	void *p_array;
>  	u32 p_array_alloc_elems;
>  	s32 val;
> +	u64 val64;
>  	struct {
>  		s32 val;
>  	} cur;

????

This patch makes no sense whatsoever. Rejecting.

Regards,

	Hans