[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ef5c6dc-5eae-41a7-9403-0d8616668c4b@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 12:43:43 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, hch@...radead.org, colyli@...nel.org,
hare@...e.de, tieren@...as.com, axboe@...nel.dk, tj@...nel.org,
josef@...icpanda.com, song@...nel.org, kmo@...erainc.com, satyat@...gle.com,
ebiggers@...gle.com, neil@...wn.name, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, johnny.chenyi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 01/15] block: cleanup bio_issue
On 9/1/25 12:32 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>
> Now that bio->bi_issue is only used by io-latency to get bio issue time,
> replace bio_issue with u64 time directly and remove bio_issue to make
> code cleaner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
It seems that this patch is completely independent of the series.
Maybe post it separately not as an RFC ?
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists