[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b245b389-e057-40d3-8e2a-7cce5c290c63@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 10:32:23 +0100
From: Quentin Monnet <qmo@...nel.org>
To: chenyuan_fl@....com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org
Cc: yonghong.song@...ux.dev, olsajiri@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chenyuan@...inos.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] bpftool: Refactor config parsing and add CET
symbol matching
2025-08-29 07:11 UTC+0100 ~ chenyuan_fl@....com
> From: Yuan CHen <chenyuan@...inos.cn>
>
> 1. **Refactor kernel config parsing**
> - Moves duplicate config file handling from feature.c to common.c
> - Keeps all existing functionality while enabling code reuse
>
> 2. **Add CET-aware symbol matching**
> - Adjusts kprobe hook detection for x86_64 CET (endbr32/64 prefixes)
> - Matches symbols at both original and CET-adjusted addresses
>
> Changed in PATCH v4:
> * Refactor repeated code into a function.
> * Add detection for the x86 architecture.
>
> Changed int PATH v5:
> * Remove detection for the x86 architecture.
>
> Changed in PATCH v6:
> * Add new helper patch (1/2) to refactor kernel config reading
> * Use the new read_kernel_config() in CET symbol matching (2/2) to check CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT
>
> Changed in PATCH v7:
> * Display actual kprobe attachment addresses instead of symbol addresses
Hi Yuan,
Is there any difference between v7 and v8 of your series? They seem
identical, from what I can see.
Quentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists