linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] mtd: core: skip badblocks increment for blocks already known bad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ldmxm1tu.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 15:16:45 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Cc: Wang Zhaolong <wangzhaolong@...weicloud.com>,  <richard@....at>,
  <vigneshr@...com>,  <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
  <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,  <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
  <yangerkun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mtd: core: skip badblocks increment for blocks
 already known bad


>> @@ -2349,11 +2350,19 @@ int mtd_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
>>   		return -EROFS;
>>     	if (mtd->flags & MTD_SLC_ON_MLC_EMULATION)
>>   		ofs = (loff_t)mtd_div_by_eb(ofs, mtd) * master->erasesize;
>>   -	ret = master->_block_markbad(master, mtd_get_master_ofs(mtd,
>> ofs));
>> +	moffs = mtd_get_master_ofs(mtd, ofs);
>> +
>> +	if (master->_block_isbad) {
>> +		ret = master->_block_isbad(master, moffs);
>> +		if (ret > 0)
>> +			return 0;
>
> Hi, Miquèl.
> Here, should we keep the same logic with the lower
> level(eg. nand_block_markbad, onenand_block_markbad) when 'ret < 0' is
> returned by master->_block_isbad. Many specific nand drivers(markbad)
> return the negative code when 'isbad' fails.

Good question, I guess in case of error in isbad() we shall probably
still try to mark the block bad because actually marking a block bad is
probably more important than returning correct statistics.

Thanks,
Miquèl