[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95bf5e07-7f03-efb0-da9b-cb50999c2524@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 19:41:06 +0800
From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
To: Wang Zhaolong <wangzhaolong@...weicloud.com>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
<richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>
CC: <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<yi.zhang@...wei.com>, <yangerkun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mtd: core: skip badblocks increment for blocks already
known bad
在 2025/9/2 17:27, Wang Zhaolong 写道:
> Repeatedly marking the same eraseblock bad inflates
> mtd->ecc_stats.badblocks because mtd_block_markbad() unconditionally
> increments the counter on success, while some implementations (e.g.
> NAND) return 0 both when the block was already bad and when it has just
> been marked[1].
>
> Fix by checking if the block is already bad before calling
> ->_block_markbad() when _block_isbad is available. Only skip the counter
> increment when we can confirm the block was already bad. In all other
> cases continue incrementing the counter.
>
> This keeps the logic centralized in mtdcore without requiring driver
> changes.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ef573188-9815-4a6b-bad1-3d8ff7c9b16f@huaweicloud.com/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Wang Zhaolong <wangzhaolong@...weicloud.com>
> ---
>
> V2:
> - Checks old state when _block_isbad exists and bails out early if already bad
>
> drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> index 5ba9a741f5ac..096a3c94670f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> @@ -2337,10 +2337,11 @@ int mtd_block_isbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtd_block_isbad);
>
> int mtd_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
> {
> struct mtd_info *master = mtd_get_master(mtd);
> + loff_t moffs;
> int ret;
>
> if (!master->_block_markbad)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> if (ofs < 0 || ofs >= mtd->size)
> @@ -2349,11 +2350,19 @@ int mtd_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
> return -EROFS;
>
> if (mtd->flags & MTD_SLC_ON_MLC_EMULATION)
> ofs = (loff_t)mtd_div_by_eb(ofs, mtd) * master->erasesize;
>
> - ret = master->_block_markbad(master, mtd_get_master_ofs(mtd, ofs));
> + moffs = mtd_get_master_ofs(mtd, ofs);
> +
> + if (master->_block_isbad) {
> + ret = master->_block_isbad(master, moffs);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + return 0;
Hi, Miquèl.
Here, should we keep the same logic with the lower level(eg.
nand_block_markbad, onenand_block_markbad) when 'ret < 0' is returned by
master->_block_isbad. Many specific nand drivers(markbad) return the
negative code when 'isbad' fails.
> + }
> +
> + ret = master->_block_markbad(master, moffs);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> while (mtd->parent) {
> mtd->ecc_stats.badblocks++;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists