lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cd671c41-2f52-4be9-b2ad-f547daff5a3a@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 17:08:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: core: Rearrange variable declarations
 involving __free()

On 03/09/2025 16:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Follow cleanup.h recommendations and always define and assign variables
> in one statement when __free() is used.
> 
> No intentional functional impact.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ