linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Add support for System Manager API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANLsYkwE+6B_CgCJQdYF_n-XOH7AkDF_e2KTJnK4EtNtHRX__w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 09:08:14 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, 
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, 
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>, 
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>, 
	linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Add support for System
 Manager API

On Wed, 3 Sept 2025 at 01:20, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > >Please give detailed suggestions, but not a general comment.
> >
> >
> > @Daniel, @Frank — since you've reviewed and R-b'd this patchset, do you
> > have thoughts on the latest feedback from Mathieu? Would you agree that
> > further simplification is needed, or is the current structure acceptable?”
>
> Peng, please trim the message when replying so that you keep only
> relevant part of the text.
>
> I think you are both right here. I understand your frustration :)
> but also Mathieu's point of view is reasonable.
>
> For a person who doesn't know the internals of IMX remoteproc the code
> is a little
> bit hard to understand. Peng I've given you my R-b because even if the
> feels like
> it is getting complicated it is still manageable and you are the
> maintainer for it.
>
> Allow me a few days to see if we can simplify the logic.
>

Excellent.

> thanks,
> Daniel.