linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add an enum for ufs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <854fad23-e7f8-42c8-b0e2-03460f481366@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 08:56:23 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: DooHyun Hwang <dh0421.hwang@...sung.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com,
 James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
 peter.wang@...iatek.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
 quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com
Cc: grant.jung@...sung.com, jt77.jang@...sung.com, junwoo80.lee@...sung.com,
 jangsub.yi@...sung.com, sh043.lee@...sung.com, cw9316.lee@...sung.com,
 sh8267.baek@...sung.com, wkon.kim@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add an enum for ufs_trace to check ufs cmd
 error

On 9/2/25 11:39 PM, DooHyun Hwang wrote:
> Could you please provide some guidance or suggestions?

How about this approach?
* In a separate patch, remove UFS_DEV_COMP because it is not used.
* Call the new enumeration label UFS_UIC_ERR (UFS UIC command error)
   since "UIC" is how the UFS standard refers to UIC commands (these are
   called "device commands" in the UFS driver).

If anyone else has a different opinion, please speak up.

Thanks,

Bart.