[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250903190145.n7su27upz2avqcm5@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 22:01:45 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 1/2] net: phylink: add lock for serializing
concurrent pl->phydev writes with resolver
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 07:48:58PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 06:23:47PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > @@ -1582,8 +1584,11 @@ static void phylink_resolve(struct work_struct *w)
> > struct phylink_link_state link_state;
> > bool mac_config = false;
> > bool retrigger = false;
> > + struct phy_device *phy;
> > bool cur_link_state;
> >
> > + mutex_lock(&pl->phy_lock);
> > + phy = pl->phydev;
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> I guess this is an artifact of the development of this patchset.
> Whatever the case, phy is set but otherwise unused in this function.
>
> This makes CI lightup like a Christmas tree.
> And it's a bit too early in the year for that.
Thanks for letting me know. It's an artifact of moving patch 1 in front
of 2, and I'll address this for the next revision.
I downgraded to a slower computer for kernel compilation, and even
though I did compile patch by patch this submission, I had to stop
building with W=1 C=1 for some unrelated bisect and I forgot to turn
them back on.
I don't have a great solution to this, except I'll try next time to set
up a separate 'git worktree' for noisy stuff like bisection, and try to
keep the net-next environment separate and always with build warnings
and debug options enabled.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists