[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLfXmIQRFTXr5h8O@stanley.mountain>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 08:52:24 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH next] ALSA: rme32: Fix serialization in
snd_rme32_capture_adat_open()
We accidentally deleted the wrong line of code when we did the
conversion to guard() locks. If the rme32->capture_substream has
already been set we should return -EBUSY.
Fixes: 8bb75ae244c5 ("ALSA: rme32: Use guard() for spin locks")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
---
sound/pci/rme32.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/pci/rme32.c b/sound/pci/rme32.c
index 123dddcb6972..ca9bbf554650 100644
--- a/sound/pci/rme32.c
+++ b/sound/pci/rme32.c
@@ -936,7 +936,7 @@ snd_rme32_capture_adat_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
scoped_guard(spinlock_irq, &rme32->lock) {
if (rme32->capture_substream != NULL)
- spin_unlock_irq(&rme32->lock);
+ return -EBUSY;
rme32->capture_substream = substream;
}
--
2.47.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists