[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250904063752.3183d523@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 06:37:52 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "pabeni@...hat.com"
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Clark Wang
<xiaoning.wang@....com>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>, "Y.B. Lu"
<yangbo.lu@....com>, "christophe.leroy@...roup.eu"
<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev"
<imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] ptp: add pulse signal loopback support for
debugging
On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 06:05:02 -0700 Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 01:55:43AM +0000, Wei Fang wrote:
> > Vladimir helped explain its purpose in the thread, do you still think
> > it is pointless?
>
> Vladimir gave practical examples for the use case, so no objection
> from my side. I just wanted to understand how this is useful.
>
> Next time, it would be helpful to have that info in the cover letter.
+1, let's get it reposted with updated cover letter.
I'm tempted to ask for a description under Documentation/, tho,
I'm not 100% clear whether authors expect users or driver developers
to exercise the loop. Maybe such distinction doesn't even makes sense
for embedded devices..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists