linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: mtk-cci: avoid redundant conditions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cb543d86-e126-451c-be24-8134a565ca73@web.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 17:32:57 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong@...o.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Angelo Gioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
 Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: mtk-cci: avoid redundant conditions

…
> it avoids writing out a condition that is unnecessary. Let's drop such

                                                         Thus?


> unnecessary conditions.

  an unnecessary condition?


Would a summary phrase like “Avoid redundant condition in mtk_ccifreq_set_voltage()”
be nicer?

Regards,
Markus