linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] cpufreq: Clean up frequency table handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250904042441.y6os6koxp5giglx4@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 09:54:41 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
Cc: "Rafael J . wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
	zhenglifeng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] cpufreq: Clean up frequency table handling

On 04-09-25, 11:22, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
> This series contains a set of cleanups around cpufreq frequency table
> handling.
> 
> The first patch drops the redundant @freq_table parameter from
> cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(). This has already been Acked, but is
> included here to avoid build issues with the following changes.

Yeah, this is not okay. You are resending an earlier patch, which is
already Acked as V1 now. You could have just mentioned the link to the
dependency patch here, and that's all.

Don't mix things like this, it doesn't look nice.

-- 
viresh