linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] cpufreq: Clean up frequency table handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ba6ddb11-43b7-444f-a907-c57755a71423@kylinos.cn>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 12:36:54 +0800
From: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, zhenglifeng
 <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] cpufreq: Clean up frequency table handling

在 2025/9/4 12:24, Viresh Kumar 写道:
> On 04-09-25, 11:22, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
>> This series contains a set of cleanups around cpufreq frequency table
>> handling.
>>
>> The first patch drops the redundant @freq_table parameter from
>> cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(). This has already been Acked, but is
>> included here to avoid build issues with the following changes.
> Yeah, this is not okay. You are resending an earlier patch, which is
> already Acked as V1 now. You could have just mentioned the link to the
> dependency patch here, and that's all.
>
> Don't mix things like this, it doesn't look nice.
>

Thanks for clarifying, Viresh.

I wasn’t aware that I could just reference the earlier Acked patch as a
dependency instead of resending it. Your suggestion makes perfect sense,
and I will do that in future submissions.

Sorry for the noise, and thanks again for the guidance!