[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLlBAuYoHIJZLfiE@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 09:34:26 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: add TI CDCE6214 binding
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 09:18:13AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 03:55:45PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Add device tree binding for the CDCE6214, an Ultra-Low Power Clock
> > Generator With One PLL, Four Differential Outputs, Two Inputs, and
> > Internal EEPROM.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/ti,cdce6214.yaml | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/dt-bindings/clock/ti,cdce6214.h | 24 +++
> > 2 files changed, 222 insertions(+)
> >
>
> I don't understand what is happening here.
>
> Patch changed in weird and unexplained way - nothing in the changelog
> explains dropping SPDX - and does not pass even checkpatch.
I removed the SPDX by accident, will add it back of course.
Other than that, what's weird? Changelog says I now use the pinctrl
subsystem to configure pins. OK, that also changes the binding, I could
have mentioned that explicitly, sorry for that.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists