[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250904-vivid-seal-from-nibiru-8c50b5@kuoka>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 11:20:31 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Benoît Monin <benoit.monin@...tlin.com>
Cc: Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>,
Sari Khoury <sari.khoury@...ileye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/19] dt-bindings: soc: mobileye: rename to eyeq-olb.yaml
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 02:47:08PM +0200, Benoît Monin wrote:
> Drop the 5 from the binding name as the OLB described in it are found
> in multiple Mobileye eyeQ SoCs.
>
> The binding already contains entries for eyeQ6L and eyeQ6H OLBs
> alongside the one for the eyeQ5.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoît Monin <benoit.monin@...tlin.com>
> ---
> .../soc/mobileye/{mobileye,eyeq5-olb.yaml => mobileye,eyeq-olb.yaml} | 2 +-
No, we don't do that. That's unneeded churn.
If you wanted to rename, you could try when adding new compatibles. And
maybe you even tried and received comment for that.
NAK
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists