linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <001001dc1d85$c0d56a60$42803f20$@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 15:51:57 +0530
From: "Pritam Manohar Sutar" <pritam.sutar@...sung.com>
To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: <vkoul@...nel.org>, <kishon@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	<andre.draszik@...aro.org>, <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
	<kauschluss@...root.org>, <ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com>,
	<igor.belwon@...tallysanemainliners.org>, <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	<s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<rosa.pila@...sung.com>, <dev.tailor@...sung.com>, <faraz.ata@...sung.com>,
	<muhammed.ali@...sung.com>, <selvarasu.g@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
 ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible

Hi Krzysztof,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> Sent: 04 September 2025 03:12 PM
> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@...sung.com>
> Cc: vkoul@...nel.org; kishon@...nel.org; robh@...nel.org;
> krzk+dt@...nel.org; conor+dt@...nel.org; alim.akhtar@...sung.com;
> andre.draszik@...aro.org; peter.griffin@...aro.org; kauschluss@...root.org;
> ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com; igor.belwon@...tallysanemainliners.org;
> m.szyprowski@...sung.com; s.nawrocki@...sung.com; linux-
> phy@...ts.infradead.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-samsung-
> soc@...r.kernel.org; rosa.pila@...sung.com; dev.tailor@...sung.com;
> faraz.ata@...sung.com; muhammed.ali@...sung.com;
> selvarasu.g@...sung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add
> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> 
> On 04/09/2025 09:51, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> >> Sent: 04 September 2025 12:18 PM
> >> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@...sung.com>
> >> Cc: vkoul@...nel.org; kishon@...nel.org; robh@...nel.org;
> >> krzk+dt@...nel.org; conor+dt@...nel.org; alim.akhtar@...sung.com;
> >> andre.draszik@...aro.org; peter.griffin@...aro.org;
> >> kauschluss@...root.org; ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@...il.com;
> >> igor.belwon@...tallysanemainliners.org;
> >> m.szyprowski@...sung.com; s.nawrocki@...sung.com; linux-
> >> phy@...ts.infradead.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> >> kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> >> linux-samsung- soc@...r.kernel.org; rosa.pila@...sung.com;
> >> dev.tailor@...sung.com; faraz.ata@...sung.com;
> >> muhammed.ali@...sung.com; selvarasu.g@...sung.com
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy:
> >> add
> >> ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> >>> Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC.
> >>> The
> >>> USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so
> >>> no driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a
> >>> dedicated compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar@...sung.com>
> >>
> >> You just dropped all tags without explaining why.
> >
> > Regretted inconvenience.
> >
> > There were significant changes in supplies' names in driver and
> > schemas (patch-set v8). This led to make changes in patch no 5.  And
> > review for these changes is needed.  Hence, removed RB tag in this patch-set.
> >
> > There was a ask for the same https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
> phy/000401dc18cd$ec02a1b0$c407e510$@...sung.com/#:~:text=Let%20me%
> 20know%2C%20because%20of%20above%20changes%2C%20should%20be%20
> removing%20your%20%0A%27reviewed%2Dby%27%20tag%20from%20patch%
> 201%20and%203.
> >
> 
> 
> Where in the changelog you explained why you dropped the tags?

Along with supplies' names, there were similar commit messages 
for patch no 1, 3 as patch no 5 (v7). (though, they were explaining 
schema more than h/w). Changed commit messages of the 
patch no 1, 3, 5 (v7) as per reference commits and would like 
to get them reviewed again, so did not add RB for patch 1 and 3,
which you had given RB (in v7). 

Forgot to add these details for dropping the RB tags in changelog. 
Do I need to send v9 by retaining RB for patch 1 and 3?

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


Thank you.

Regards,
Pritam