[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250905085309.94596-3-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 10:53:08 +0200
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] bpf: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
system_unbound_wq should be the default workqueue so as not to enforce
locality constraints for random work whenever it's not required.
Adding system_dfl_wq to encourage its use when unbound work should be used.
queue_work() / queue_delayed_work() / mod_delayed_work() will now use the
new unbound wq: whether the user still use the old wq a warn will be
printed along with a wq redirect to the new one.
The old system_unbound_wq will be kept for a few release cycles.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 4 ++--
kernel/bpf/memalloc.c | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index e3a2662f4e33..b969ca4d7af0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -1593,7 +1593,7 @@ void bpf_timer_cancel_and_free(void *val)
* timer callback.
*/
if (this_cpu_read(hrtimer_running)) {
- queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &t->cb.delete_work);
+ queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &t->cb.delete_work);
return;
}
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ void bpf_timer_cancel_and_free(void *val)
if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&t->timer) >= 0)
kfree_rcu(t, cb.rcu);
else
- queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &t->cb.delete_work);
+ queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &t->cb.delete_work);
} else {
bpf_timer_delete_work(&t->cb.delete_work);
}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
index 889374722d0a..bd45dda9dc35 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
@@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static void destroy_mem_alloc(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, int rcu_in_progress)
/* Defer barriers into worker to let the rest of map memory to be freed */
memset(ma, 0, sizeof(*ma));
INIT_WORK(©->work, free_mem_alloc_deferred);
- queue_work(system_unbound_wq, ©->work);
+ queue_work(system_dfl_wq, ©->work);
}
void bpf_mem_alloc_destroy(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 9794446bc8c6..bb6f85fda240 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_in_work(struct bpf_map *map)
/* Avoid spawning kworkers, since they all might contend
* for the same mutex like slab_mutex.
*/
- queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &map->work);
+ queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &map->work);
}
static void bpf_map_free_rcu_gp(struct rcu_head *rcu)
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists