lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <046b289d-b6a5-45f9-88b1-090e2ab7c95d@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 09:33:42 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
 Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex@...arskis.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
 Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
 Daniel Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
 Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...phandler.com>,
 Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>, Sakari Ailus
 <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: leds: commonize leds property

Hi,

On 8-Sep-25 09:20, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 9/8/25 1:18 AM, Aleksandrs Vinarskis wrote:
>> A number of existing schemas use 'leds' property to provide
>> phandle-array of LED(s) to the consumer. Additionally, with the
>> upcoming privacy-led support in device-tree, v4l2 subnode could be a
>> LED consumer, meaning that all camera sensors should support 'leds'
>> and 'led-names' property via common 'video-interface-devices.yaml'.
>>
>> To avoid dublication, commonize 'leds' property from existing schemas
>> to newly introduced 'led-consumer.yaml'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex@...arskis.com>
>> ---
> 
> [...]
> 
>>  
>> +  leds:
>> +    minItems: 1
>> +    maxItems: 1
> 
> My brain compiler suggests this will throw a warning (minItems should
> be redundant in this case)
>> +
>> +  led-names:
>> +    enum:
>> +      - privacy-led
> 
> Nit: "privacy" makes more sense without the suffix, as we inherently
> know this is supposed to be an LED

Note "privacy-led" as name is already used on the x86/ACPI side and
the code consuming this will be shared.

With that said if there is a strong preference for going with just
"privacy" the x86 side can be adjusted since the provider-info is
generated through a LED lookup table on the x86/ACPI side. So we can
just modify both the lookup table generation as well as the already
existing led_get(dev, "privacy-led") call to use just "privacy"
without problems.

Regards,

Hans



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ