[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ccb27487-9b3f-489f-bcea-dc5d7cca465e@csgroup.eu>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 10:55:46 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] dt-bindings: soc: fsl: qe: Convert QE GPIO to DT
schema
Rob, Conor, Krzysztof,
Can one of you or someone else help me with below comment from Rob ?
Le 03/09/2025 à 06:58, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
> Hi Rob,
>
> Le 02/09/2025 à 23:24, Rob Herring a écrit :
>> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 02:05:13PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>> Convert QE QPIO devicetree binding to DT schema.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
>>> ---
>>> v5: New
>>> ---
>>
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + items:
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - fsl,chip-qe-pario-bank
>>> + - const: fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank
>>> +
>
> snip
>
>>
>>> + compatible = "fsl,mpc8360-qe-pario-bank", "fsl,mpc8323-qe-
>>> pario-bank";
>>
>> Doesn't match the schema.
>>
>
> Can you be more explicit ? Is it the 'mpc8360' ? It is the 'chip'.
>
>
> bindings/soc/fsl/cpm_qe/qe/par_io.txt was saying:
>
> - compatible : should be "fsl,<chip>-qe-pario-bank", "fsl,mpc8323-qe-
> pario-bank".
>
> Which I first translated in yaml as :
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> items:
> - enum:
> - fsl,<chip>-qe-pario-bank
> - const: fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank
>
> But 'make dt_binding_check' complained about the < > around 'chip' so I
> removed them.
>
> How should it be described ?
>
Here is what we have in existing DTS upstream:
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/mpc8569mds.dts-
compatible = "fsl,mpc8569-qe-pario-bank",
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/mpc8569mds.dts:
"fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank";
--
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/mpc8569mds.dts-
compatible = "fsl,mpc8569-qe-pario-bank",
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/mpc8569mds.dts:
"fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank";
--
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/kmeter1.dts-
compatible = "fsl,mpc8360-qe-pario-bank",
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/kmeter1.dts:
"fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank";
--
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc832x_rdb.dts:
compatible = "fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank";
--
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc836x_rdk.dts- compatible =
"fsl,mpc8360-qe-pario-bank",
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc836x_rdk.dts:
"fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank";
--
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc836x_rdk.dts- compatible =
"fsl,mpc8360-qe-pario-bank",
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc836x_rdk.dts:
"fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank";
If the problem in the DT schema is the fsl,chip-qe-pario-bank, should I
replace it with the two possible compatible we have in existing DTS, ie
"fsl,mpc8569-qe-pario-bank" and "fsl,mpc8360-qe-pario-bank", or should I
just ignore them are they are useless for the drivers, or else ?
Thanks
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists