[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMG02wO6fvsHY4bL@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 07:26:51 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Yi Tao <escape@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, mkoutny@...e.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] cgroup: refactor the cgroup_attach_lock code to
make it clearer
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 02:59:33PM +0800, Yi Tao wrote:
> Dynamic cgroup migration involving threadgroup locks can be in one of
> two states: no lock held, or holding the global lock. Explicitly
> declaring the different lock modes to make the code easier to
> understand and facilitates future extensions of the lock modes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Tao <escape@...ux.alibaba.com>
Applied to cgroup/for-6.18. There was a conflict that I resolved. Please
check the tree to make sure that it looks alright.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists