[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMHIzUuNx9LXQdag@lipo>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 21:51:57 +0300
From: Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] iio: accel: bma220: add get regulator check
Hello Jonathan,
thank you for the blazing fast feedback!
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 06:58:41PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 10:57:11 +0300
> Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro> wrote:
>
> I don't follow the 'add get regulator check' of the patch description.
> This is ensuring they are powered up if necessary. So I'd
> just go with the vague: "turn power supplies on"
to be honest I added this just because I've seen the devm_regulator_bulk_get_enable() function used all over the place in iio code.
but looking at the linux/regulator/consumers.h header I was more puzzled.
just some forward declarations and then static functions doing exactly nothing.
I'm afraid to ask what that is all about. placeholder for a future API?
best regards,
peter
> > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> >
> > @@ -205,6 +206,13 @@ static const struct iio_info bma220_info = {
> > static int bma220_init(struct spi_device *spi)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > + static const char * const regulator_names[] = { "vddd", "vddio", "vdda" };
> > +
> > + ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get_enable(&spi->dev,
> > + ARRAY_SIZE(regulator_names),
> > + regulator_names);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(&spi->dev, ret, "Failed to get regulators\n");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists