[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfuZ_5akK8qc1zOtNXpwOWCUTB0tZhJqs=tZ-+71Wdosg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 23:28:21 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] iio: accel: bma220: add get regulator check
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 9:52 PM Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 06:58:41PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 10:57:11 +0300
> > Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro> wrote:
> >
> > I don't follow the 'add get regulator check' of the patch description.
> > This is ensuring they are powered up if necessary. So I'd
> > just go with the vague: "turn power supplies on"
>
> to be honest I added this just because I've seen the devm_regulator_bulk_get_enable() function used all over the place in iio code.
> but looking at the linux/regulator/consumers.h header I was more puzzled.
> just some forward declarations and then static functions doing exactly nothing.
> I'm afraid to ask what that is all about. placeholder for a future API?
You probably see two things in one place:
1/ declaration of the function that is implemented in the C-code
2/ stub for the case when implementation is switched off (usually via
kernel configuration).
I recommend using elixir.bootlin.com to browse the code, or locally
via cscope or similar.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists