[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb565554-f7f8-4e40-8ca4-d265f59aec9e@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:38:52 -0500
From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.sheoy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: ACPI: Use on_each_cpu_mask() in drv_write()
On 9/9/25 6:41 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Make drv_write() call on_each_cpu_mask() instead of using an open-coded
> equivalent of the latter.
>
> No intentional functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
I feel you should also update the comment before do_drv_write() to
mention it's called with a NULL conditional to
smp_call_function_many_cond(), or just drop that comment.
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@...nel.org>
> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 8 +-------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -335,14 +335,8 @@ static void drv_write(struct acpi_cpufre
> .val = val,
> .func.write = data->cpu_freq_write,
> };
> - int this_cpu;
>
> - this_cpu = get_cpu();
> - if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
> - do_drv_write(&cmd);
> -
> - smp_call_function_many(mask, do_drv_write, &cmd, 1);
> - put_cpu();
> + on_each_cpu_mask(mask, do_drv_write, &cmd, true);
> }
>
> static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data)
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists