[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc776b20-7fc0-4889-be27-29d6fcb3d3ad@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:23:09 +0800
From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, "Mark
Bloch" <mbloch@...dia.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Gal Pressman
<gal@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net/mlx5e: Harden uplink netdev access against
device unbind
On 9/10/2025 9:23 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:07:04 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote:
>> + struct net_device *netdev = mlx5_uplink_netdev_get(dev);
>> + struct mlx5e_priv *priv;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + if (!netdev)
>> + return 0;
>
> Please don't call in variable init functions which require cleanup
> or error checking.
But in this function, a NULL return from mlx5_uplink_netdev_get is a
valid condition where it should simply return 0. No cleanup or error
check is needed.
Thanks!
Jianbo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists