[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8a0af57-7576-41fe-b5a3-474a06d9de88@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:12:44 +0530
From: Harikrishna Shenoy <h-shenoy@...com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
CC: <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <rfoss@...nel.org>,
<Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, <jonas@...boo.se>,
<jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
<mripard@...nel.org>, <tzimmermann@...e.de>, <airlied@...il.com>,
<simona@...ll.ch>, <lumag@...nel.org>, <dianders@...omium.org>,
<andy.yan@...k-chips.com>, <linux@...blig.org>,
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <aradhya.bhatia@...ux.dev>,
<javierm@...hat.com>, <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devarsht@...com>, <u-kumar1@...com>, <s-jain1@...com>,
<lyude@...hat.com>, <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] drm/bridge: cadence: cdns-mhdp8546-core: Set the
mhdp connector earlier in atomic_enable()
On 9/9/25 19:44, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 02:38:21PM +0530, Harikrishna Shenoy wrote:
>> From: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>
>>
>> In case if we get errors in cdns_mhdp_link_up() or cdns_mhdp_reg_read()
>> in atomic_enable, we will go to cdns_mhdp_modeset_retry_fn() and will hit
>> NULL pointer while trying to access the mutex. We need the connector to
>> be set before that. Unlike in legacy !(DBANC) cases, we do not have
>> connector initialised in bridge_attach(). So set the mhdp->connector
>> in atomic_enable() earlier to avoid possible NULL pointer.
>>
>> Fixes: c932ced6b585 ("drm/tidss: Update encoder/bridge chain connect model")
>> Signed-off-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>
>> ---
>> .../drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c | 20 +++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> It looks like you should reorder your commits: first apply the DBANC
> fixes, then drop support for !DBANC.
Before dropping !DBANC support, we can't change the connector to pointer
cleanly
by cleanly I mean,the driver should be build correctly after applying
each commit.
So, if the patches which fixes the bug of NULL pointer de reference due
to DBNAC
are applied before dropping the code related to !DBANC code will result
in build failure.
Hence the sequencing of commits.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists