[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4af4def2-b4d8-4826-8613-a5fca9900e13@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 11:28:15 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: corbet@....net, tony.luck@...el.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com,
Dave.Martin@....com, james.morse@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, kas@...nel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org,
pmladek@...e.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, kees@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
fvdl@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com, perry.yuan@....com,
manali.shukla@....com, sohil.mehta@...el.com, xin@...or.com,
Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com, peterz@...radead.org, tiala@...rosoft.com,
mario.limonciello@....com, dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com, michael.roth@....com,
chang.seok.bae@...el.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, peternewman@...gle.com, eranian@...gle.com,
gautham.shenoy@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 26/33] fs/resctrl: Introduce mbm_assign_on_mkdir to
enable assignments on mkdir
Hi Boris,
On 9/11/25 10:08, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 04:34:25PM -0500, Babu Moger wrote:
>> The "mbm_event" counter assignment mode allows users to assign a hardware
>> counter to an RMID, event pair and monitor the bandwidth as long as it is
>> assigned.
>>
>> Introduce a user-configurable option that determines if a counter will
>> automatically be assigned to an RMID, event pair when its associated
>> monitor group is created via mkdir. Accessible when "mbm_event" counter
>> assignment mode is enabled.
>
> This is just a note for the future - you don't have to go change things now:
> reading those commit messages back-to-back, there's a lot of boilerplate code
> which repeats with each commit message and there's a lot of text talking what
> the patch does.
>
> Please tone this down in the future - it is really annoying and doesn't bring
> a whole lot by repeating things or explaining the obvious. Just concentrate on
> explaining why the patch exists and mention any non-obvious things.
Agreed. Thanks for the note.
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists