[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aML41e2csdTdSTNU@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 18:29:09 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Cc: bsegall@...gle.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mgorman@...e.de, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, tanghui20@...wei.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
wangtao554@...wei.com, zhangqiao22@...wei.com,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Increase sched_tick_remote timeout
Le Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 12:13:00PM -0400, Phil Auld a écrit :
> Increase the sched_tick_remote WARN_ON timeout to remove false
> positives due to temporarily busy HK cpus. The suggestion
> was 30 seconds to catch really stuck remote tick processing
> but not trigger it too easily.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
> Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists