[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0760036f-db69-487c-94b9-a6e405dee0e8@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 08:07:51 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
Zhangchao Zhang <ot_zhangchao.zhang@...iatek.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Luiz Von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Jiande Lu <jiande.lu@...iatek.com>,
Deren Wu <deren.Wu@...iatek.com>, Chris Lu <chris.lu@...iatek.com>,
Hao Qin <Hao.qin@...iatek.com>,
linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-mediatek <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] Bluetooth: mediatek: add gpio pin to reset bt
On 11/09/2025 01:29, Sean Wang wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Sorry again for the confusion. I believe Zhangchao is still new to the
> upstream process, and we’ll work together to improve this. Since this
> series has become a bit hard to follow, would you agree that it might
> be better for us to restart with a clean patch that addresses the
> review comments? A clean version would make it easier for reviewers to
> focus on the current issues without being distracted by earlier
> mistakes.
No. If you cannot send v7 of patchset as real patchset, sending again v1
won't change anything.
For seven versions contributor did not bother to respond to feedback and
did not care to read submitting patches how this process looks like.
Effect is this totally broken v7.
This patch introduces undocumented ABI which kernel tools, if used, also
point out.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists