linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] Bluetooth: mediatek: add gpio pin to reset bt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGp9Lzqk-mXiNq2iSrTk-Ed40_2j3GSuLMJcWoE1_iy7yY9-qw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 19:10:33 -0500
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Zhangchao Zhang <ot_zhangchao.zhang@...iatek.com>, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>, 
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Luiz Von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>, 
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, 
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Jiande Lu <jiande.lu@...iatek.com>, 
	Deren Wu <deren.Wu@...iatek.com>, Chris Lu <chris.lu@...iatek.com>, 
	Hao Qin <Hao.qin@...iatek.com>, linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	linux-mediatek <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] Bluetooth: mediatek: add gpio pin to reset bt

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:07 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/09/2025 01:29, Sean Wang wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > Sorry again for the confusion. I believe Zhangchao is still new to the
> > upstream process, and we’ll work together to improve this. Since this
> > series has become a bit hard to follow, would you agree that it might
> > be better for us to restart with a clean patch that addresses the
> > review comments? A clean version would make it easier for reviewers to
> > focus on the current issues without being distracted by earlier
> > mistakes.
>
> No. If you cannot send v7 of patchset as real patchset, sending again v1
> won't change anything.
>
> For seven versions contributor did not bother to respond to feedback and
> did not care to read submitting patches how this process looks like.
>
> Effect is this totally broken v7.
>
> This patch introduces undocumented ABI which kernel tools, if used, also
> point out.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Hi Krzysztof,

Thanks for the feedback and for spending time reviewing this driver.
We’ll continue with v8 instead of restarting from v1, and hope it will
be improved to meet the requirements.

                          Sean