[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAXPR04MB8459CABA152B6C1C122B35F28809A@PAXPR04MB8459.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 01:13:59 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Frank Li <frank.li@....com>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Mathieu Poirier
<mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Hiago De Franco <hiago.franco@...adex.com>,
"linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 6/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Clean up after ops
introduction
Hi Frank,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Clean up after ops
> introduction
> >
> > - if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->detect_mode)
> > - return dcfg->ops->detect_mode(priv->rproc);
> > -
> > - switch (dcfg->method) {
>
> Can you remove 'method' in data struct also?
The method is used in other places and other purpose, imx_rproc_detach
imx_rproc_put_scu, imx_rproc_remove, it is also referred
imx_dsp_rproc.c.
Could we keep it for now?
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> Frank
> > - case IMX_RPROC_NONE:
> > + /*
> > + * To i.MX{7,8} ULP, Linux is under control of RTOS, no need
> > + * dcfg->ops or dcfg->ops->detect_mode, it is state
> RPROC_DETACHED.
> > + */
> > + if (!dcfg->ops || !dcfg->ops->detect_mode) {
> > priv->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
> > return 0;
> > - default:
> > - break;
> > }
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return dcfg->ops->detect_mode(priv->rproc);
> > }
> >
> > static int imx_rproc_clk_enable(struct imx_rproc *priv)
> >
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists