[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c320ebea-7c3c-460b-99eb-35f1dc1a3dc3@bootlin.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:22:26 +0200
From: Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet@...tlin.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Pascal Eberhard <pascal.eberhard@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: dsa: microchip: configure strap pins
during reset
Hi Miquèl,
On 9/10/25 5:38 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hello bastien,
>
>> +static int ksz_configure_strap(struct ksz_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct pinctrl_state *state = NULL;
>> + struct pinctrl *pinctrl;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->dev->of_node, "microchip,ksz8463")) {
>> + struct gpio_desc *rxd0;
>> + struct gpio_desc *rxd1;
>> +
>> + rxd0 = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev->dev, "strap", 0, GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>> + if (IS_ERR(rxd0))
>> + return PTR_ERR(rxd0);
>> +
>> + rxd1 = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev->dev, "strap", 1, GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>> + if (IS_ERR(rxd1))
>> + return PTR_ERR(rxd1);
>> +
>> + /* If at least one strap definition is missing we don't do anything */
>> + if (!rxd0 || !rxd1)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get(dev->dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(pinctrl))
>> + return PTR_ERR(pinctrl);
>> +
>> + state = pinctrl_lookup_state(pinctrl, "reset");
>> + if (IS_ERR(state))
>> + return PTR_ERR(state);
>> +
>> + ret = pinctrl_select_state(pinctrl, state);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> In order to simplify the pinctrl handling I would propose to replace
> these three function calls by:
>
> devm_pinctrl_get_select(dev->dev, "reset")
>
> I do not think in this case we actually require the internal
> devm_pinctrl_put() calls from the above helper, but they probably do not
> hurt either.
>
True, thank you.
Best regards,
Bastien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists