[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3d142be-3980-4d4e-9d66-c03276694bf9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 23:03:43 +0900
From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: corbet@....net, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tmgross@...ch.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/19] tools/docs: sphinx-build-wrapper: add a wrapper
for sphinx-build
On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:04:20 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:15:44 +0900
> Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com> escreveu:
>
>> [-CC: rust people and list]
>>
>> OK, Looks like I have to bite.
>>
>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:33:34 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> The current approach of using LaTeX for PDF is dirty:
>>>
>>> - Sphinx can't produce a LaTeX file from the Kernel trees without
>>> hundreds of warnings;
>>> - latexmk hides some of them, but even it just one warning is reported,
>>> the return status is not zero.
>>
>> This sounds interesting to me.
>> As far I remember, I have never seen such strange results of latexmk
>> under build envs where all the necessary packages are properly installed.
>
> I saw it here on multiple distros including Fedora (which is the one
> I use on my desktop). Media jenkins CI running on Debian always suffered
> from such issues, up to the point I started ignoring pdf build results.
>
So please provide exact steps for me to see such errors.
I don't have any issues after strictly following the suggestions from
sphinx-pre-install under Fedora.
I even invoked [...]/output/latex/Makefile manually after running
"make latexdocs" by:
- cd [...]/output/latex/
- make PDFLATEX="latexmk -xelatex" LATEXOPTS="-interaction=batchmode -no-shell-escape" -j6 -O all
, and all the PDFs were built without any issues.
Quite puzzling ...
Or does your Fedora have some Noto CJK variable fonts installed?
Hmm ...
Thanks,
Akira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists