[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f591ac9-d3e0-4404-987c-40eceaf51fbb@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:28:55 -0700
From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 perf/core 0/6] uprobe,bpf: Allow to change app registers
from uprobe registers
On 9/9/25 9:41 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 8:39 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>> we recently had several requests for tetragon to be able to change
>> user application function return value or divert its execution through
>> instruction pointer change.
>>
>> This patchset adds support for uprobe program to change app's registers
>> including instruction pointer.
>>
>> v3 changes:
>> - deny attach of kprobe,multi with kprobe_write_ctx set [Alexei]
>> - added more tests for denied kprobe attachment
>>
>> thanks,
>> jirka
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Jiri Olsa (6):
>> bpf: Allow uprobe program to change context registers
>> uprobe: Do not emulate/sstep original instruction when ip is changed
>> selftests/bpf: Add uprobe context registers changes test
>> selftests/bpf: Add uprobe context ip register change test
>> selftests/bpf: Add kprobe write ctx attach test
>> selftests/bpf: Add kprobe multi write ctx attach test
>>
>
> For the series:
>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
>
> Question is which tree will this go through? Most changes are in BPF,
> so probably bpf-next, right?
Hi Jiri.
This series does not apply to current bpf-next, see below.
Could you please respin it with bpf-next tag?
E.g. "[PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/6] ..."
Thanks!
$ git log -1 --oneline
a578b54a8ad2 (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD,
kernel-patches/bpf-next) Merge branch
'bpf-report-arena-faults-to-bpf-streams'
$ b4 am 20250909123857.315599-1-jolsa@...nel.org
[...]
$ git am
./v3_20250909_jolsa_uprobe_bpf_allow_to_change_app_registers_from_uprobe_registers.mbx
Applying: bpf: Allow uprobe program to change context registers
Applying: uprobe: Do not emulate/sstep original instruction when ip is
changed
error: patch failed: kernel/events/uprobes.c:2768
error: kernel/events/uprobes.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0002 uprobe: Do not emulate/sstep original instruction
when ip is changed
[...]
>
>> include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
>> kernel/events/core.c | 4 +++
>> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 7 +++++
>> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 7 +++--
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe.c | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_write_ctx.c | 22 +++++++++++++
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_uprobe.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 9 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_write_ctx.c
Powered by blists - more mailing lists