linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490: Introduce Radxa Dragon Q6A

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1ae48740-1788-4304-be86-455251a02ce3@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 10:12:54 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Xilin Wu <sophon@...xa.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@....qualcomm.com>,
 Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490: Introduce Radxa Dragon
 Q6A

On 12/09/2025 10:03, Xilin Wu wrote:
> base-commit: 51095600e8c19d53729a7fbd273abc4435a25e9b
> change-id: 20250912-radxa-dragon-q6a-eedcdeaf3e66
> prerequisite-message-id: <20250902164900.21685-1-quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
> prerequisite-patch-id: 257564b609217fda19c9f3424fcd9f6e2ce3ef3c
> prerequisite-patch-id: a8f21781f3bff140260100b74041752000c06000
> prerequisite-patch-id: b46127e2433ede17cc5e1a012f58041c6ef97b13
> prerequisite-patch-id: e8978c5a30373c3ff312b2c8720f586c389f18f8
> prerequisite-message-id: <20250911043256.3523057-1-viken.dadhaniya@....qualcomm.com>
> prerequisite-patch-id: c7a057030b78afbbb231280de3765294c006c6f8
> prerequisite-patch-id: 56011305aa35e4c64fc7d63950764807cb81cc4d
> prerequisite-patch-id: c3d3b313ac6abe4ec10fd820b6a9bbc63fdbdb82
> prerequisite-patch-id: 63ee94d0ccd40f60a98b0004d627ad2e7b440d25
> prerequisite-patch-id: 392e8f1902571e5035d5af72e40dc474b5f1b274
> prerequisite-patch-id: e38fba722bdabc02ba09d2dc51df7010dbe28168
> prerequisite-patch-id: a3ca5dba8def5769ffb4b95df2963da60a736f96
> prerequisite-patch-id: 4c0fe8d677d73aaf1b5b842e072246d84729d1c4
So the RFC is because it cannot be yet merged? Please always add such
note in the cover letter.

Also, are you sure these are real dependencies? Like REALLY real
dependencies?

Best regards,
Krzysztof