linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490: Introduce Radxa Dragon Q6A

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c9fad3b5-dc9e-425c-b48b-f6481eb14e90@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 19:39:48 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Xilin Wu <sophon@...xa.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@....qualcomm.com>,
 Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490: Introduce Radxa Dragon
 Q6A

On 14/09/2025 17:57, Xilin Wu wrote:
> Radxa Dragon Q6A is a single board computer, based on the Qualcomm
> QCS6490 platform.
> 
> Features enabled and working:
> 
> - Three USB-A 2.0 ports
> - RTL8111K Ethernet connected to PCIe0
> - eMMC module
> - SD card
> - M.2 M-Key 2230 PCIe 3.0 x2
> - Headphone jack
> - Onboard thermal sensors
> - QSPI controller for updating boot firmware
> - ADSP remoteproc (Type-C and charging features disabled in firmware)
> - CDSP remoteproc (for AI applications using QNN)
> - Venus video encode and decode accelerator
> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

I see huge diff, like 200-300 lines being changed against v1 and you
claim that I reviewed this one?

No, that's not true. Please read submitting patches - if you change
significantly the patch, you must drop the tag and explain the reason.

NAK, unreviewed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof