[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250915070250.416423-1-zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:02:50 +0800
From: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
To: "Rafael J . wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: zhenglifeng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: Replace pointer subtraction with iteration macros
The cpufreq documentation suggests avoiding direct pointer
subtraction when working with entries in driver_freq_table, as
it is relatively costly. Instead, the recommended approach is
to use the provided iteration macros:
- cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry_idx()
Update freq_table.c accordingly to replace pointer difference
calculations with the proper macros. This improves code clarity
and follows the established cpufreq coding style.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
---
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
index d5111ee56e38..ca06a0236e70 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
@@ -33,16 +33,17 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *table = policy->freq_table;
unsigned int min_freq = ~0;
unsigned int max_freq = 0;
+ unsigned int i = 0;
unsigned int freq;
- cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
+ cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry_idx(pos, table, i) {
freq = pos->frequency;
if ((!cpufreq_boost_enabled() || !policy->boost_enabled)
&& (pos->flags & CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ))
continue;
- pr_debug("table entry %u: %u kHz\n", (int)(pos - table), freq);
+ pr_debug("table entry %u: %u kHz\n", i, freq);
if (freq < min_freq)
min_freq = freq;
if (freq > max_freq)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists