[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMfWKobwM5bhJEAd@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 11:02:34 +0200
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
To: fenglin.wu@....qualcomm.com
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaraman.narayanamurthy@....qualcomm.com>,
David Collins <david.collins@....qualcomm.com>,
György Kurucz <me@...uczgy.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, kernel@....qualcomm.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] power: supply: qcom_battmgr: update compats for
SM8550 and X1E80100
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 04:49:57PM +0800, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@....qualcomm.com>
>
> Add variant definitions for SM8550 and X1E80100 platforms. Add a compat
> for SM8550 and update match data for X1E80100 specifically so that they
> could be handled differently in supporting charge control functionality.
>
> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org> # on Thinkpad T14S OLED
> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c
> index 008e241e3eac3574a78459a2256e006e48c9f508..174d3f83ac2b070bb90c21a498686e91cc629ebe 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c
> @@ -19,8 +19,10 @@
> #define BATTMGR_STRING_LEN 128
>
> enum qcom_battmgr_variant {
> - QCOM_BATTMGR_SM8350,
> QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP,
> + QCOM_BATTMGR_SM8350,
> + QCOM_BATTMGR_SM8550,
> + QCOM_BATTMGR_X1E80100,
> };
>
> #define BATTMGR_BAT_STATUS 0x1
> @@ -1333,7 +1335,8 @@ static void qcom_battmgr_pdr_notify(void *priv, int state)
> static const struct of_device_id qcom_battmgr_of_variants[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP },
> - { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SM8550 },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_X1E80100 },
> /* Unmatched devices falls back to QCOM_BATTMGR_SM8350 */
> {}
> };
I think you need to squash this with "[PATCH 7/8] power: supply:
qcom_battmgr: Add charge control support", or move the modified checks
for
if (battmgr->variant == QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP ||
battmgr->variant == QCOM_BATTMGR_X1E80100) {
into this patch.
With this patch right now, I would expect that your series is not
bisectable: The wrong code paths are chosen if you only apply this patch
because e.g. X1E doesn't use the QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP code anymore.
Thanks,
Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists