lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3559cbe4-b2e2-42d4-85ad-554258fc9dec@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:44:40 +0800
From: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@....qualcomm.com>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson
 <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
        Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
        Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <subbaraman.narayanamurthy@....qualcomm.com>,
        David Collins <david.collins@....qualcomm.com>,
        György Kurucz <me@...uczgy.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, kernel@....qualcomm.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] power: supply: qcom_battmgr: update compats for
 SM8550 and X1E80100


On 9/15/2025 5:02 PM, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 04:49:57PM +0800, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@....qualcomm.com>
>>
>> Add variant definitions for SM8550 and X1E80100 platforms. Add a compat
>> for SM8550 and update match data for X1E80100 specifically so that they
>> could be handled differently in supporting charge control functionality.
>>
>> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org> # on Thinkpad T14S OLED
>> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <fenglin.wu@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c | 7 +++++--
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c
>> index 008e241e3eac3574a78459a2256e006e48c9f508..174d3f83ac2b070bb90c21a498686e91cc629ebe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c
>> @@ -19,8 +19,10 @@
>>   #define BATTMGR_STRING_LEN	128
>>   
>>   enum qcom_battmgr_variant {
>> -	QCOM_BATTMGR_SM8350,
>>   	QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP,
>> +	QCOM_BATTMGR_SM8350,
>> +	QCOM_BATTMGR_SM8550,
>> +	QCOM_BATTMGR_X1E80100,
>>   };
>>   
>>   #define BATTMGR_BAT_STATUS		0x1
>> @@ -1333,7 +1335,8 @@ static void qcom_battmgr_pdr_notify(void *priv, int state)
>>   static const struct of_device_id qcom_battmgr_of_variants[] = {
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP },
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP },
>> -	{ .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SM8550 },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_X1E80100 },
>>   	/* Unmatched devices falls back to QCOM_BATTMGR_SM8350 */
>>   	{}
>>   };
> I think you need to squash this with "[PATCH 7/8] power: supply:
> qcom_battmgr: Add charge control support", or move the modified checks
> for
>
> 	if (battmgr->variant == QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP ||
> 	    battmgr->variant == QCOM_BATTMGR_X1E80100) {
>
> into this patch.
>
> With this patch right now, I would expect that your series is not
> bisectable: The wrong code paths are chosen if you only apply this patch
> because e.g. X1E doesn't use the QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP code anymore.
>
> Thanks,
> Stephan

I see.

I was making it this way to address the review comment from Bryan in 
patch v2 about separating the compats change. See here: 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/7f001134-e099-492d-8ce5-4122d83a3de3@linaro.org/

If I revise it according to your 2nd suggestion, would it conflict with 
Bryan's feedback?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ