[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdX4V7pG9X=sa8e+2oOT0HpR9FcD78c-e1x81g+qbUrypA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 13:30:35 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Biju <biju.das.au@...il.com>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] can: rcar_canfd: Move enabling of RAM clk from probe()
Hi Biju,
Thanks for your patch!
On Fri, 12 Sept 2025 at 12:47, Biju <biju.das.au@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
>
> The RAM clk needs to be enabled in resume for proper operation in STR mode
> for RZ/G3E SoC. This change also result in less power consumption.
results
Note that after this patch, the amount of power consumption is
unchanged, as the RAM clock is still enabled during probe, and disabled
during remove.
I suspect that on RZ/G3E the RAM clock was disabled after resume?
>
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
For the code changes:
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists