[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250916144652.GA1795814@bhelgaas>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 09:46:52 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Randolph Lin <randolph@...estech.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
jingoohan1@...il.com, mani@...nel.org, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
kwilczynski@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, alex@...ti.fr,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
ben717@...estech.com, inochiama@...il.com,
thippeswamy.havalige@....com, namcao@...utronix.de,
shradha.t@...sung.com, randolph.sklin@...il.com,
tim609@...estech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: andes: Add Andes QiLai SoC PCIe host driver
support
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 06:04:16PM +0800, Randolph Lin wrote:
> Add driver support for DesignWare based PCIe controller in Andes
> QiLai SoC. The driver only supports the Root Complex mode.
> +config PCIE_ANDES_QILAI
> + bool "ANDES QiLai PCIe controller"
> + depends on OF && (RISCV || COMPILE_TEST)
> + depends on PCI_MSI
> + depends on ARCH_ANDES
This prevents a lot of compile testing. AFAICT, no other controller
depends directly on the arch. Most do something like these:
depends on MACH_ARTPEC6 || COMPILE_TEST
depends on ARCH_MXC || COMPILE_TEST
depends on OF && (ARM || ARCH_LAYERSCAPE || COMPILE_TEST)
> + select PCIE_DW_HOST
> + help
> + Say Y here to enable PCIe controller support on Andes QiLai SoCs,
> + which operate in Root Complex mode. The Andes QiLai SoCs PCIe
> + controller is based on DesignWare IP (5.97a version) and therefore
> + the driver re-uses the DesignWare core functions to implement the
> + driver. The Andes QiLai SoC has three Root Complexes (RCs): one
> + operates on PCIe 4.0 with 4 lanes at 0x80000000, while the other
> + two operate on PCIe 4.0 with 2 lanes at 0xA0000000 and 0xC0000000,
> + respectively.
I assume these addresses come from devicetree, so I don't think
there's any need to include them here.
Fix space/tab indentation issue on first line of help text. Do the
indentation the same way as the rest of the file.
> + * Refer to Table A4-5 (Memory type encoding) in the
> + * AMBA AXI and ACE Protocol Specification.
> + * The selected value corresponds to the Memory type field:
> + * "Write-back, Read and Write-allocate".
Add blank line between paragraphs or rewrap into a single paragraph.
> +static
> +bool qilai_pcie_outbound_atu_addr_valid(struct dw_pcie *pci,
> + const struct dw_pcie_ob_atu_cfg *atu,
> + u64 *limit_addr)
> +{
> + u64 parent_bus_addr = atu->parent_bus_addr;
> +
> + *limit_addr = parent_bus_addr + atu->size - 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * Addresses below 4 GB are not 1:1 mapped; therefore, range checks
> + * only need to ensure addresses below 4 GB match pci->region_limit.
> + */
> + if (lower_32_bits(*limit_addr & ~pci->region_limit) !=
> + lower_32_bits(parent_bus_addr & ~pci->region_limit) ||
> + !IS_ALIGNED(parent_bus_addr, pci->region_align) ||
> + !IS_ALIGNED(atu->pci_addr, pci->region_align) || !atu->size)
> + return false;
Seems a little bit strange. Is this something that could be expressed
via devicetree? Or something peculiar about QiLai that's different
from all the other DWC-based controllers?
> + * Setup the Qilai PCIe IOCP (IO Coherence Port) Read/Write Behaviors to the
> + * Write-Back, Read and Write Allocate mode.
> + * The IOCP HW target is SoC last-level cache (L2 Cache), which serves as the
> + * system cache.
> + * The IOCP HW helps maintain cache monitoring, ensuring that the device can
> + * snoop data from/to the cache.
Add blank lines between paragraphs (or rewrap into a single paragraph
if that's what you intend).
> +static struct platform_driver qilai_pcie_driver = {
> + .probe = qilai_pcie_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "qilai-pcie",
> + .of_match_table = qilai_pcie_of_match,
> + /* only test passed at PROBE_DEFAULT_STRATEGY */
> + .probe_type = PROBE_DEFAULT_STRATEGY,
This is the only use of PROBE_DEFAULT_STRATEGY in the entire tree, so
I doubt you need it. If you do, please explain why in more detail.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists