[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250916144621.5606-1-kmal@cock.li>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:46:21 +0300
From: kemal <kmal@...k.li>
To: ruanjinjie@...wei.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v6 10/10] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry
Hi, can you make it so that this patch series support Syscall User
Dispatch? There needs to be 2 changes:
1 - Implementing arch_syscall_is_vdso_sigreturn
Here is my implementation for it:
(I checked for syscallno unlike x86, which checks if the IP exactly
matches with the VDSO sigreturn symbol. This solution seems better to me)
bool arch_syscall_is_vdso_sigreturn(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long addr, pc;
pc = regs->pc - 4;
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
if (is_compat_task()) {
addr = (unsigned long)current->mm->context.sigpage;
if (pc >= addr && pc < addr + PAGE_SIZE)
return true;
return false;
}
#endif
if (regs->syscallno != __NR_rt_sigreturn)
return false;
addr = (unsigned long)current->mm->context.vdso;
if (pc < addr || pc >= addr + vdso_info[VDSO_ABI_AA64].vdso_pages * PAGE_SIZE)
return false;
return true;
}
2 - This trick shouldn't be done if the syscall will be catched by SUD:
if (scno == NO_SYSCALL)
syscall_set_return_value(current, regs, -ENOSYS, 0);
As the ABI could be anything.
Thanks,
-kemal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists