[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250916170709.l6ahgfigcbqrlbj2@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 20:07:09 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
"linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH phy 13/14] dt-bindings: phy: lynx-28g: add compatible
strings per SerDes and instantiation
Hi Josua,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 02:35:43PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> I've seen your proposal map out on the Lynx 10G SerDes, and it would
> look like this:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20230413160607.4128315-3-sean.anderson@seco.com/
> You can hardly consider it "KISS" when the device tree specifies what
> value should be written to what PCCR register for what protocol.
...
> Anyway, I don't see why the above can be future extensions, and aren't
> my main preoccupation right now. For now we just need to sort out the
> lane capability detection per SerDes.
Do you have any further feedback? I would like to keep the ball rolling
and submit a new version. One thing I could do is I could require
#phy-cells to be 0 when using one of the new compatibles like
"fsl,lx2160a-serdes1", and 1 when "fsl,lynx-28g" is found.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists