[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c32f5c8b-0c62-4567-9d82-081ecb0889b1@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:33:44 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Lizhi Xu
<lizhi.xu@...driver.com>, Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+205ef33a3b636b4181fb@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] usbip: Fix locking bug in RT-enabled kernels
On 9/16/25 09:47, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 09:41:43AM +0800, Lizhi Xu wrote:
>> Interrupts are disabled before entering usb_hcd_giveback_urb().
>> A spinlock_t becomes a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT, so it cannot be
>> acquired with disabled interrupts.
>>
>> Save the interrupt status and restore it after usb_hcd_giveback_urb().
>>
>> syz reported:
>> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
>> Call Trace:
>> dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120
>> rt_spin_lock+0xc7/0x2c0 kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:57
>> spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_rt.h:44 [inline]
>> mon_bus_complete drivers/usb/mon/mon_main.c:134 [inline]
>> mon_complete+0x5c/0x200 drivers/usb/mon/mon_main.c:147
>> usbmon_urb_complete include/linux/usb/hcd.h:738 [inline]
>> __usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x254/0x5e0 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1647
>> vhci_urb_enqueue+0xb4f/0xe70 drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c:818
>>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+205ef33a3b636b4181fb@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=205ef33a3b636b4181fb
>> Signed-off-by: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>
>> ---
>> V1 -> V2: fix it in usbip
>>
>> drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
>> index e70fba9f55d6..eb6de7e8ea7b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c
>> @@ -809,15 +809,15 @@ static int vhci_urb_enqueue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, gfp_t mem_flag
>> no_need_xmit:
>> usb_hcd_unlink_urb_from_ep(hcd, urb);
>> no_need_unlink:
>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags);
>> if (!ret) {
>> /* usb_hcd_giveback_urb() should be called with
>> * irqs disabled
>> */
>> - local_irq_disable();
>> + spin_unlock(&vhci->lock);
>> usb_hcd_giveback_urb(hcd, urb, urb->status);
>> - local_irq_enable();
>> + spin_lock(&vhci->lock);
>> }
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vhci->lock, flags);
>> return ret;
>> }
>
> This looks right to me; it's the same pattern that the other host
> controller drivers use. However, the final decision is up to the usbip
> maintainers.
>
> Also, there are several other places in the usbip drivers where
> usb_hcd_giveback_urb() gets called; shouldn't they all be changed to
> follow this pattern?
>
Looks good to me.
+1 on changing all other instances - can we do that?
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists