linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] alloc_tag: mark inaccurate allocation counters in /proc/allocinfo output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250915212133.de5b8522137a5ed30efe956e@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 21:21:33 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: kent.overstreet@...ux.dev, vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org,
 usamaarif642@...il.com, rientjes@...gle.com, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
 harry.yoo@...cle.com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, 00107082@....com,
 pyyjason@...il.com, pasha.tatashin@...een.com, souravpanda@...gle.com,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] alloc_tag: mark inaccurate allocation counters
 in /proc/allocinfo output

On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 20:34:33 -0700 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com> wrote:

> >
> > > could you fold it into the existing patch or
> > > should I respin?
> >
> > A little fixlet would be preferred (by me, at least).
> 
> Ok, should I post a fixup patch or you will do that in-place?

I think the former, please.  Your intent is preferable to my
interpretation of your intent and we get all the nice patch metadata to
track everything.