lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpFonUPE0FL5XGm0paYp9ZXeAKK6mjHO_8hUkyxfyduL=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 21:39:02 -0700
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kent.overstreet@...ux.dev, vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org, 
	usamaarif642@...il.com, rientjes@...gle.com, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, 
	harry.yoo@...cle.com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, 00107082@....com, 
	pyyjason@...il.com, pasha.tatashin@...een.com, souravpanda@...gle.com, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] alloc_tag: mark inaccurate allocation counters in
 /proc/allocinfo output

On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 9:21 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 20:34:33 -0700 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > > could you fold it into the existing patch or
> > > > should I respin?
> > >
> > > A little fixlet would be preferred (by me, at least).
> >
> > Ok, should I post a fixup patch or you will do that in-place?
>
> I think the former, please.  Your intent is preferable to my
> interpretation of your intent and we get all the nice patch metadata to
> track everything.

Will do first thing in the morning. Thanks!

>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ