[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMpQs4+J2zYgZaGYBSaf4UwzKZY-qMoD1oe2vmgJQXAfghqu=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:04:21 +0800
From: Binbin Zhou <zhoubb.aaron@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@...ngson.cn>, Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
jeffbai@...c.io, kexybiscuit@...c.io, wangyao@...ote.com
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v11 0/3] LoongArch: Add Loongson-2K BMC support
Hi Lee:
Thanks for your reply.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 4:40 PM Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2025, Binbin Zhou wrote:
>
> > Hi Lee:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 10:33 PM Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 04 Sep 2025 20:35:04 +0800, Binbin Zhou wrote:
> > > > This patchset introduces the Loongson-2K BMC.
> > > >
> > > > It is a PCIe device present on servers similar to the Loongson-3 CPUs.
> > > > And it is a multifunctional device (MFD), such as display as a sub-function
> > > > of it.
> > > >
> > > > For IPMI, according to the existing design, we use software simulation to
> > > > implement the KCS interface registers: Stauts/Command/Data_Out/Data_In.
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > Applied, thanks!
> > >
> > > [1/3] mfd: ls2kbmc: Introduce Loongson-2K BMC core driver
> > > commit: 67c2639e1fc1a07b45d216af659c0dd92a370c68
> > > [2/3] mfd: ls2kbmc: Add Loongson-2K BMC reset function support
> > > commit: 2364ccc827e44064e9763f2ae2d1dcc5f945fdf3
> >
> > Thanks for acknowledging my patchset.
> >
> > I can't confirm why you didn't apply the IPMI patch, but this appears
> > to break the patchset's integrity, potentially causing missing Kconfig
> > dependencies (IPMI_LS2K select MFD_LS2K_BMC_CORE).
>
> Pretty sure this doesn't break anything.
>
> What build errors do you see as a result?
>
> > Additionally, as Corey previously explained[1], this patch can be
> > applied through your side.
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aFVtNAY4u2gDiLDS@mail.minyard.net/
>
> We only apply cross-subsystem patch-sets to a single tree if there are
> good reasons to do so. In this instance, I can't see any reason why the
> IPMI driver cannot go in via it's own repo.
However, there still seems to be a text dependency issue. The IPMI
patch modifies the MAINTAINERS, which depends on the first patch.
If the entire series of patches cannot be merged together, does this
mean the IPMI patch can only be merged after the MFD patch has been
merged into the mainline?
>
> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]
--
Thanks.
Binbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists