linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for Microchip EMC1812

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a86f859e-d70e-4444-a867-b54fc2ff01a8@baylibre.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:38:31 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Marius.Cristea@...rochip.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
 jic23@...nel.org, nuno.sa@...log.com, conor+dt@...nel.org, andy@...nel.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for Microchip EMC1812

On 9/17/25 8:30 AM, Marius.Cristea@...rochip.com wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
>>>
>>> Current version of driver does not support interrupts, events and
>>> data
>>> buffering.
>>>
>>> Differences related to previous patch:
>>
>> This is confusing. I think this version is v1, so there is
>> no previous patch. So why does this say "previous patch"?
>> Is this actually v2?
>>
> 
> No, this is the first patch. I put it there as a patch history and fill
> it up as the patch versioning progress.
> 
Got it. Next time, it would be better to not add the changelog
until v2. We are not used to seeing that in v1. :-)