linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 10/21] tools/docs: sphinx-build-wrapper: add a wrapper for sphinx-build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <875xdhazcq.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 09:11:01 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>, mchehab+huawei@...nel.org
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jani Nikula
 <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/21] tools/docs: sphinx-build-wrapper: add a
 wrapper for sphinx-build

Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com> writes:

> Wait!  In the cover-letter, you said:
>
>     It should be noticed that it is out of the scope of this series
>     to change the implementation. Surely the process can be improved,
>     but first let's consolidate and document everything on a single
>     place.
>
> Removing current restriction on SPHINXDIRS does look inconsistent with
> your own words to me.
>
> So, I guess I have to NAK 06/21 as well.

Is there an actual problem with this change that we need to know about?
I am not quite understanding the objection here.

Thanks,

jon